Sunday, November 6, 2011

Why I Won't Support OWS

1 comment:
OccupyDC Protesters Use Kids to Blockade Door During Violent Scuffle

Violent OWS Protesters Prevent Woman in Wheelchair From Leaving Event

Rome 'Occupy' protest turns violent

Vandals at Occupy Oakland

(note the people cheering on the last clip)

Sexual Assaults at Occupy Wall Street Explained

This only scratches the surface, there's been over 100 documented cases outrageous behavior.

Say what you want about Tea Baggers, at least they pick up their trash, don't break shit and rape people. 

Wednesday, November 2, 2011

Things are nuts...

So last night my grandmother passed away in her sleep last night. She was on hospice for good year before she became bed bound a couple of months ago. Last month she suffered a stroke and it  was downhill from there with some up days. So things have been a little hectic lately and even more so today and as the week comes to a close. I want to thank everyone who offered their condolences via Facebook and Twitter.

So I'm getting ready for her wake this weekend and after that I have to study, take my state boards and then drive out to my new hometown Las Vegas, Nevada. When I get to Nevada I'll be basically have a cell phone as my primary internet source. Even still I will be spending a lot of time finding work which will be a week or two. (Finding a job in the health care industry is a cakewalk) However, I still will try to manage to blog more than I do now after the move even with these hurdles. My last trip to Vegas had so many ideas racing though my head for articles and videos I wanted to make and since I will be living there it will be living in inspiration.

One piece I've been working on for sometime comparing public and private sidewalks and walkways will be competed when I get out there. So keep an eye out here for that!

On a side note, I made myself a private Facebook for personal things I don't want to share publicly and decided to make my old Facebook public. So if you wanted to add me, go ahead. If you added me and you were one of the internet friends I purged due to privacy concerns, go ahead and re-add me. Also, I'll be posting videos of my trek there and on Twitter and my secondary YouTube Channel.

Thanks again guys. See you all soon. 

Wednesday, October 19, 2011

More Racist Zeitards - IAM18YEARSOLDANDOVER

Updated: He hasn't learned his lesson. See below.
Came across this gem of a Zeitard today:

So if I disagree with Zeitgeist I jerk off to child porn? LOLWUT? Let's see who this guys is, we'll start with his favorites:

Me thinks this guy is projecting his sick pedo fetish on me. Let's check his recent activity:

A pedo AND a racist! NICE! Let's look closer, shall we? 

This guy makes voiceofretard467 look like MLK jr!

Google search of his YouTube comments with the keyword "nigger" finds more than enough of of his racist nonsense. Here's some other gems I found with that search.

At 0:59, the fat black nigger from Afreakahhhhhhh is like, "That was nasty". Ironic considering that her appearance and weight would make her nasty automatically.

All the white women at back we're all getting wet for this young black mans large and hard dick. They probably all rode him after the show, including Judge Judy, taking turns on his large pleasure pole.

The Zeitgeist Movement produces quality members, I must say!

Update: He was exposed and now he diabled his channel. Too bad Google got his whole history, happy searching:
How about some Google Cache?

Let's see what our friend has been up to lately. Surely he must of learned his lesson right?

@TheButterfly252 Hey nigger, the little nigger girl in the video has weaves, something all niggers go and get because they self-hate (racist towards themselves) about their own racial features. I don't blame them though, the nigger features are very disgusting to look at and have no aesthetic properties which is why you very rarely see any good looking nigger models on the world stage. Also, niggers have lower intelligence on average than all other human groups, just like most of them are poor.

This is pathetic

It's amazing how hard Beyonce is trying to make herself look white. I know a lot of African American 'women' in USA who wish so much to be white and have beautiful long straight hair like white girls do and have facial features that are actually attractive to men. Don't get me started on the ugly attitudes that black women are born with.

You are RACIST to talk like that about "black womyn". You must be UGLY period, but YOUR attitude is ugliest!

&Beyonce is not trying so hard to make her self look white, she IS light-skinned and been. Her mother is of French descent. Dumbass!
MANAiiA 3 weeks ago

@IAM18YEARSOLDANDOVER Oh wow, it's amazing how ignorant and racist you are being. Just because they prefer their hair straight they're suddenly 'trying to be white'? Asians have straight hair.. why is she copying white people and not asians? Okay, white people wants to be tanner and darker, does that mean they're trying to be black or asian?
reginakezya 3 weeks ago 37

@reginakezya Beyonce is clearly trying to copy White people. Look at the straight hair she is artifically making on her head AND then dying it into a light colour like white people's - something black people can almost never achieve!!! :D Also, when people tan they aren't trying to look like the colour of shit, they're just after a slight glow "orange" tinge to their skin. They don't want to overcook and look like shit. :DD

@IAM18YEARSOLDANDOVER Your fucking racist.
kim101318 2 weeks ago

@kim101318 I am just talking real stuff here which was always going to be found offensive by you because you are the target of the unfortunate facts of this world. Kim, a black Nigger woman in a white country, UK, talking to me on a white invention (computer). We run this world nigger bitch. You going to collect another welfare check that I paid for through my tax? How many children are you going to pop out this month? I know black sheboon love creating more criminal babies. Baboon! Ooga booga

@IAM18YEARSOLDANDOVER Dont hide behind a screen being racist because if you want to be racist so badly, be racist in public and you will see the kind of reaction you will get. And im a teenager so i wouldnt be wanting to 'pop out any kids'. All the sluts and pregnant hoes i know these days are white.
kim101318 2 weeks ago

@kim101318 I am racist all the time in public, I make I set let others know how vile the Nigger beast is. About 80% of Nigger sheboons are unmarried (because they can't get a man) and have babies. True facts! Also, you are in the UK (White country), go back to Afreakahhhhhhh to see your bruddas and sistas and see them all fuck each other without a care in the world, k? Good. Afreakahhhhhh, your homeland, has plenty of AIDS and HIV like Niggers because of their uncontrolled sex behaviour. Freaks

What's disturbing about this one is that he's talking about minors.

This comment has received too many negative votes hide
Imagine a big black ugly Nigger dick inside that beautiful White pale girl.

This comment has received too many negative votes hide
@IAM18YEARSOLDANDOVER Yhur Juss So Racist Its A Damn Shame. Yhur Goinn To Hell Where Yhu Deserve To Be.
ImJussDoinnMe006 2 weeks ago

This comment has received too many negative votes hide
@ImJussDoinnMe006 There are a lot of ugly Black Nigger ape sheboons who want to see their ugly Black Nigger ape baboon men fuck the life out of petite and tiny, beautiful, blonde, and pale White girl. So that the ugly Black Nigger ape sheboons can finally get out of their insecurities about their ugly facial features, hair and attitude. A lot of ugly Black Nigger ape sheboons will acquire ashy skin in their lifetime and be single with more than one child and no husband.

Tuesday, October 4, 2011

The best video anyone has ever made me.

Peter Joseph decided to revive his dying 'movement' by having a free arts festival and only 70-80 people showed up. All the pictures showed it it was a failure, no media outlets picked it up. Not even the fringe media cared. I did a blog about this less than a month ago and James Kush reblogged it. One Zeitard got angry I was exposing his group's failure and decided to defend it by lying. He posted a comment on Kush's blog saying:

"The LA event was featured over on Hollywood Blvd by the Hollywood Walkway. We had a turn out of over 3,500, it was packed, same thing with the European and the other events during that time."

Fast forward today I was talking with some other Zeitard and he butted in by making me this video. Made my morning. Now it's 600. He is either full of shit, OR he couldn't tell the difference between 600 and 3,500 people unless his leader directly tells him. The video shows about 70-80 but he refuses to give up on this lie and shows video evidence of his bullshit. Remember, there were 14 artists and bands and limited green room space so some of the artists were probably walking around in that crowd. We wanted more evidence regarding how many people attended the event and voiceofreason467 delivered the goods. We now know attendance was around roughly 80 people.

This is the level of intelligence you can expect from a lot of The Zeitgeist Movement. If you want to have more laughs, see the YouTube video's comment section. I backed up the ones that were there as of this positing just in case he comes to his senses and deletes the video. I have little hope that this kid will ever admit he was wrong because he hasn't even when I set him up to lie and he lies, then lies about lying and comes up with another lie to replace his old one. This kid is seriously damaged.

NOTE: I am machwon. The person I debating this with was GalinoreGustave2 and the creator of the video is voiceofreason467
  • Just for the record:
    "The LA event was featured over on Hollywood Blvd by the Hollywood Walkway. We had a turn out of over 3,500, it was packed, same thing with the European and the other events during that time." - voiceofreason
    is (dot) gd / MtAZTo
    Now it's 600? I only see 80... 90 tops. Anyways, this video is featured on my channel. Greatest thing I've seen all week!
  • @machwon "Now it's 600?"
    I explained why I got the number wrong and Peter corrected me... you are just being an idiot starting with your conclusion and working your way backward. But what would I expect from a nonintellectual who follows Anarcho Capitalism (an inherently contradictory ideology), someone who starts off calling everyone who gets something wrong by a mistake a liar, and someone who blindly follows the Austrian School and uses only Austrian sources to critique someone.
  • @machwon Now, considering your dishonesty and your bullshit rhetoric, I have had it up to here with it to be honest. You refuse to consider yourself wrong and start off with any discussion believing the other side is full of shit. You started off your interaction with me believing I am a liar and thus that has colored your reactions to anything I present. I have shown that you have misrepresented everything I have said from day one and because of it I am done with you... blocked.
  • I thought you guys said you were done with each other.
  • @MisterBoswell He's interrupting on a conversation I was having with Galinore.
  • Meh maybe I was wrong. I'd say about 80.
  • @machwon "Meh maybe I was wrong. I'd say about 80."
    I see, so you refuse to admit that you were wrong and you can't admit that the LA event housed far more than you want to admit because you started with the conclusion and are trying to rationalize any evidence away. Nice job, oh and by the way, the line I showed also extends around the corner, I just didn't bother get footage of it because I didn't think I would have to engage in this argument.
  • Bingo nights at the retirement houses are more cheerful and livid than that failure of a show.
  • @G4Br1ELCLM Were you there? Oh wait... no because you're a troll.

Friday, September 30, 2011

No comments:

Jim Jesus' Law:
The amount someone talks about logical fallacies is inversely proportional to how much they know about logic. 

Jim Jesus' Second Law:
Those who utter the phrase 'excessive fallacy' can not be reasoned with.

Jim Jesus' Third Law:
          The more someone admires Nikola Tesla, the less they know about him and the more crazy they are.

Tuesday, September 27, 2011

New design and new shirt!

No comments:
2 things:
Thing 1: As you can see I changed the layout of the blog, added a new logo and provided sharing buttons to make it easier to link this blog on Facebook, Twitter and Google+ Tell me what you think.

Thing 2: Not that I think anyone would buy it, but I designed a Shitegeist Movement shirt just because I was bored and was re-familiarizing myself with Photoshop.

Monday, September 26, 2011

Hovind 2.0: Peter Joseph Quote Mines Keynes to Lie To His Followers.

I'm no Keynesian. However I feel as if I should come to his defense. John Maynard Keynes was wrong about macroeconomics, but he wasn't stupid. At least not stupid enough to buy into one of the biggest fallacies in economics: The Luddite Fallacy. However, you may of heard of it as "technological unemployment."

In case you're still scratching your head, I'll let Henry Hazlitt explain:

Among the most viable of all economic delusions is the belief that machines on net balance create unemployment. Destroyed a thousand times, it has risen a thousand times out of its own ashes as hardy and vigorous as ever. Whenever there is a long-continued mass unemployment, machines get the blame anew. This fallacy is still the basis of many labor union practices. The public tolerates these practices because it either believes at bottom that the unions are right, or is too confused to see just why they are wrong.

The belief that machines cause unemployment, when held with any logical consistency, leads to preposterous conclusions. Not only must we be causing unemployment with every technological improvement we make today, but primitive man must have started causing it with the first efforts he made to save himself from needless toil and sweat.

The Zeitgeist Movement and The Venus Project have a slight twist on this fallacy. In a nutshell instead of enacting policies to prevent technology, we should instead use it to create abundance of essential goods for people to consume freely. Now I know that I'll be getting the typical comments saying THIS IS A STRAWMAN BECAUSE YOU DIDN'T MENTION THIS THIS AND THIS ASPECT OF OUR ARGUMENT! Which is irrelevant since I'm not out to debunk the claim because it's been debunked so many times over the last 200 years, it's hardly worth the effort. I will list some resources at the bottom of the blog in case you haven't heard this myth debunked. I'm just showing how they differ from other economic illiterates. So modern leftists say stop automation, Zeitards say go with it and no one has to work anymore. Got it? Good!

Now recently I had the misfortune of watching the leader of The Zeitgeist Movement, Peter Joseph Merola, get grilled by the RT News Network anchor Lauren Lyster when he made a claim I've never heard before at about 3:20-3:37

"Many economists"? "Like John Maynard Keynes"? Look, say what you will about the guy, but he's not stupid enough to fall for the Luddite Fallacy. In fact, no major economist from any school of economics agrees with this, aside from some Neo-Keynesians who blame outsourcing but not technology. If there is one thing most economists agree on, is that this is a fallacy. So was Peter lying or just making yet another uneducated comment? We'll see. First let's examine Keynes.

I did some digging though some Zeitgeist material and within a few minutes I found what it was they were using to back this up in their "Activist Orientation Guide"

As John Maynard Keynes, in The General Theory of Unemployment, Interest and Money
disdainfully points out:
”We are being afflicted with a new disease of which some readers may not yet have heard the name, but of which they will hear a great deal in the years to come – namely ‘technological unemployment’. This means unemployment due to our discovery of means of economizing the use of labor outrunning the pace at which we can find new uses for labor.” -Keynes, John Maynard, The General Theory of Unemployment, Interest and Money, 1931

Interesting, yes? However that quote is not in 'The General Theory of Unemployment, Interest and Money.' In fact there is no book called "The General Theory of Unemployment, Interest and Money." I'm sure some of my economic junkie readers are folding their arms reading that, but let me clarify.

There is no book titled: 'The General Theory of Unemployment, Interest and Money.' Keynes treatise was titled 'The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money' and it wasn't written in 1931. It was written in 1936 and discusses the Great Depression mostly in the years 1929-1935. This quote was from an essay published in 1930 titled: Economic Possibilities for our Grandchildren 

I submit this error was intentional. The reason why is because the very next paragraph shows clearly that Keynes did not hold this to be accurate. This is a deliberate quote mine, there's no way around it.

For the moment the very rapidity of these changes is hurting us and bringing difficult problems to solve. Those countries are suffering relatively which are not in the vanguard of progress. We are being afflicted with a new disease of which some readers may not yet have heard the name, but of which they will hear a great deal in the years to come – namely, technological unemployment. This means unemployment due to our discovery of means of economising the use of labour outrunning the pace at which we can find new uses for labour.

But this is only a temporary phase of maladjustment. All this means in the long run that mankind is solving its economic problem. I would predict that the standard of life in progressive countries one hundred years hence will be between four and eight times as high as it is to-day. There would be nothing surprising in this even in the light of our present knowledge. It would not be foolish to contemplate the possibility of afar greater progress still.

There you have it, all pink and naked. Peter Joseph is the new Kent Hovind. He pretends to have credentials, he quote mines, has a double standard on copyright, and holds to a unscientific worldview which is not scientific at all. We already know he thinks you don't have to pay income tax, so we'll wait for the IRS to bust him so we can have 2 fake Doctors in one cell.

Why technological unemployment is crap:
EagleEye1975 on Eeconomics In One Lesson Chapter 7. Part 1 Part 2
Open Letter to Barack Obama by Don Boudreaux
Robert Murphy ph.D on The Curse of Machinery

Monday, September 12, 2011

Zeitgeist Media Fail

UPDATED Oct. 4, 2011

For those of you who know anything about The Zeitgeist Movement, I'm sure you've heard them annoyingly promoting their latest idea of pushing their crackpot ideas on the world "The Zeitgeist Media Festival." The idea was to plan an event with artists and speakers and show films in order to promote the concept of the redundantly named "Resource Based Economy." They planned to have events world wide but only funded only a few. If not a few than most definitely the one in Los Angeles, CA. The date was set on September 11, 2011 the 10 year anniversary of the 9/11 terrorist attacks in New York, Washington, D.C. and Pennsylvania (They're not a conspiracy theory movement, by the way. Wink, wink)

Now earlier this year, many of those most vocal against TZM noticed quite the fall in support in 2011's Z-Day as opposed to their 2010 events. While the size of the London event was significantly larger, mostly due the the fact that it was the headline event where Peter Joseph Merola, Jacque Fresco and Roxanne Meadows were set to speak, events around the world were fewer with less people attending. It showed a significant decline in interest in the movement as a whole as even Alexa traffic ratings showed a tapering off even lower than pre-Zeitgeist: Moving Forward levels.

If the drop of interest only as marginal as the time before, this would make for a very dry blog entry. Rest assured, it only gets better considering you're not a Zeitard.

While we expected some turn out to the 1st Annual (which is stupid, nothing is annual it's first time) Zeitgeist Media Festival, I personally was shocked at the level of failure of this event. Merola spent a lot of time organizing and promoting this and as little information as we've been able to gather, around only 100 people (which is a liberal estimate) attended the main event in Los Angeles. New York was as dismal, as the only pictures we could find purposely avoided the crowd. London was a joke with probably around 20-30 people attending. Germany was hardly a media anything, but rather a 10 person picnic.

As of September 12th, 9:45 PM CDT there is currently NO coverage mentioned on Google News. I mean NONE. No mainstream or fringe media. Not even the almighty RussiaToday which pimps their garbage gave a shit. I can't find any blogs covering the events aside from James Kush outlining it's failure to attract anyone. This alone is pathetic, but could it get worse? Well, when asking this question about The Zeitgeist Movement, the answer is usually always YES!

The Official TZMF Thread on the Official TZM Fourms had NO coverage aside from asking where to view it on the internet. V-Radio has made NO mention of it. The Zeitgeist Los Angeles Chapter makes NO mention of it after the announcement as the same for the whole State of California, Sacremento, New York or even United Kingdom or London! In fact as I browse around looking for something to show as an exception on this blog, I simply can not find a single Zeitgeist blog, chapter, or forum talking about this damn thing. It is as if this event never even came to pass.

Correct me if I am wrong, dear Zeitgeisters, but wasn't the point to reach critical mass? How does one get negative interest in offering people free shit for sitting around doing nothing that doesn't involve some kind of get rich scheme? I think I might have the answer. The fact that Peter Joseph Merola called it The Zeitgeist Movement after the first batshit crazy conspiracy theory film and people are waking up to the fact that they were just hanging out with nutjobs. There's not a week that goes by that I don't get some message on Twitter or my YouTube Channel accusing me of being a government agent. In fact, Peter Joseph himself has accused those who criticize The Zeitgeist Movement regularly as being paid by a "reputation company" to do this. Let me state, that as of yet I have never been paid one cent by anyone to do what I do. However if there are those interested, contact me and I will leave you my PayPal address.

Joking aside, The Zeitgeist Movement is dead and The Zeitgeist Movement killed it. Their ass-hattery and paranoid delusional fantasies have scared everyone with more than 2 brain cells away. I really don't see a point on paying too much attention to them anymore, so I think this will be one of the last things I'll put effort into as far as criticizing them goes. I might tweet or post something if they do something exceptionally fail again but, for the most part there's bigger fish to fry.

For now, I'll leave you a fitting song for TZM. We hardly knew ye.

Well we got more proof now that the LA show was a disaster. A Zeitard by the name of voiceofreason467 tried to disprove this by providing proof there was only 70 people. Ignore the mumbley commentary and enjoy.